Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aviation Sceptic's avatar

Brilliant insights drawing upon your already extensive research regarding the NGO / Nonprofit shadow structure. In our military, the services (Army, AF, USN, USMC) organize, train, and equip forces that are sent to the combatant commands to actually conduct operations. You are explaining the NGO structure that performs the same function(s). As you state, "none of this is secret, and it's legal...The question is whether the public understands what they’re looking at when they see a “protest” on the news...What they’re looking at is a four-layer operation with a strategic command that decides whether to act, a dispatch network that assembles the crowd through cell-based relay, a trained tactical corps executing a published curriculum, and a logistics tail that keeps the operation fed, equipped, and transported for as long as the strategic layer decides it should run." Also, as you state: "When the curfew orders came down, perhaps assisted by the machine getting a credible threat to their tax-exempt status, the machine shut down in one Signal message. That is the difference between a movement and an operation. A movement doesn’t have an off switch." I'd personally be very interested in the "why" they shut it down. IRS issues, credible threat to members (unlikely), or threat to leadership at a relatively high level (more likely)? You have explained the "Who, what, when and how" very clearly. The always difficult "why" they stopped is elusive, but critically important, IMO.

Jane Adams's avatar

It’s fascinating how basic organizing tactics have been funded and professionalized by foundations and NGOs with no democratic procedures to allow participants to debate and decide the program. The tyranny of the foundations and NGOs. It’s pretty dismaying.

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?